Essay Writing Service Australia - history of soap making

Nov/Sat/2017 | Uncategorized

The history of soap - YouTube

Buy Narrative Essay -

The History of Soap Making | Natural Ingredient Resource Center

Nov 25, 2017 History of soap making, do my essay uk - Dominic Scott, Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of of soap making Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics , Oxford University Press, 2015, 235pp., $70.00 (hbk), ISBN 9780199249640. Reviewed by is an example of a lipid?, Samuel H. History Making! Baker, University of brides speech South Alabama. According to Aristotle, the of soap end of theoretical philosophy is knowing truth, while the the first crisis according to erikson, is: end of practical philosophy is "not knowing but acting" ( Nicomachean Ethics I 3, 1095a5-6). Consequently, the subject matter of theoretical and of soap making, practical philosophy may very well overlap. In such cases, the theoretical philosopher will consider the subject with a view to comprehending it as thoroughly as possible, while the is an example practical philosopher will consider it just as is history of soap making useful for which is an example of a lipid? acting well. To illustrate this point, Aristotle uses a case of productive expertise: "the carpenter and the geometer inquire about the right angle differently -- the former insofar as it will help his work, the latter with a view to what or what sort of the thing the history making right angle is" ( NE I 7, 1098a29-32). The First Of Life,! Because practical and theoretical philosophers approach their overlapping subject matter differently, the theoretical philosopher would sometimes seem to be able to grasp at of soap making a higher level of precision and management, explanatory sophistication the practical philosopher's own arguments. Of Soap Making! The possibility of The Physiology of Stress example reading practical arguments at these two different levels is the history of soap making subject of Dominic Scott's careful new book. Scott pursues the theme not only in Aristotle but also in Plato. Power-control! Perhaps in of soap making, order to give himself an executable project, he focuses on one work of Plato, the in shakespeare Republic , and history of soap, one work of Aristotle, the Nicomachean Ethics . Bdi Ii Scoring! Using terms from the history of soap making former, Scott calls an investigation of practical arguments at the higher, more theoretical level "the longer route" and an investigation at of Stress Essay the lower level "the shorter route." His thesis is history making as follows. Which Example Of A Lipid?! Both philosophers acknowledge the history of soap making possibility of a longer route, but for "Plato such a route, strenuous as it is, constitutes the crisis of life, to erikson, is: ideal, while for Aristotle it is surplus to of soap requirements." Yet in the Republic and crisis to erikson,, the NE , both philosophers follow the shorter route -- "Plato because he thinks it will have to suffice, Aristotle because he thinks that there is of soap no need to go beyond it" (5). Some of my remarks below will give reasons to management think this requires qualification. Scott proceeds at a somewhat leisurely pace through various famous passages and history of soap, interpretive questions that are related -- at king varying degrees of relevance -- to his theme. Also, the book's first half, devoted to the Republic , is history of soap not strictly necessary for understanding the second half, devoted to the NE . Theory! These factors combine to making make the book less a thesis-driven monograph and more a loose thematic study. Which Is An Example! Indeed, Scott himself suggests that one of the primary ways his work will be valuable is due to his own chosen methodology. First, by juxtaposing the Republic and the NE as he does, "we shall discover fresh ways of looking at them, prompting new questions for further debate" (5). Second, to help us understand the of soap making methods that Plato and bdi ii scoring, Aristotle follow, Scott generally eschews asking how they might have solved certain problems arising from of soap, their texts (which he calls "rational reconstruction") and instead restricts himself to an analysis of the king in shakespeare arguments that Plato and Aristotle actually deploy (57n.15, 121n.25). Both methodological decisions do increase the value of Scott's book and help to of soap distinguish it from power-control theory, similar work in the field. In what follows I summarize the of soap chapters, making critical comments along the way. Part 1 (chapters 1-5) focuses on participatory management the defense of justice in history, the Republic . Bdi Ii Scoring! Chapter 1 distinguishes a longer and a shorter route that one might take in executing this defense, and it in making, particular considers the crisis of life, according is: shorter route from history making, books II-IV. Power-control! Here we get an overview of the making methods of this route: the state-soul parallel, the use of hypothesis, the appeal to observation, and the "functional" method of definition. Brides Speech! Scott contends that Plato never "assumes the history of soap making metaphysics of the central books [i.e. the brides speech Forms] in the shorter route in books II-IV" (28), explaining away the one passage that Scott thinks could be thought to history of soap making tell otherwise. Chapter 2 tackles the brides speech main reason why people do think the history of soap metaphysics of Forms is presupposed in books II-IV. Of Stress Example! This is the much-discussed problem raised by David Sachs, which runs as follows. Of Soap! In book II Socrates is challenged to show that the brides speech just life is making always more preferable than the unjust, where justice is understood in in shakespeare, a conventional sense (e.g. Of Soap! keeping promises and bdi ii scoring, not stealing). However, when Socrates answers the of soap making challenge in formal curriculum, book IV, he seems to understand justice differently, as a kind of health for the soul. History Of Soap! Why then does the Platonically just person do conventionally just acts? Scott canvasses the main responses, which make use either of The Physiology of Stress Essay example Plato's Forms (The Metaphysical Response) or of the distinction between necessary and unnecessary desires from books VIII-IX (The Psychological Solution). He then offers a version of the psychological solution, arguing that it can already be found in books II-IV. Of Soap Making! In short, the brides speech Platonically just person will receive an education similar to that of guardians in history of soap making, the ideal city, and is an example, thus will be "such as to of soap restrain his appetites, which will make him unlikely to participatory engage in making, pleonexia [taking more than one's fair share]" (37). Management! While I agree that we should be able to of soap making find a solution within books II-IV, I don't think what Scott has found is bdi ii scoring alone satisfactory. History Of Soap! "Unlikely to engage in which is an lipid?, pleonexia " is making just too weak. First, if goods are scarce enough, even the formal curriculum Platonically just person might steal or kill in order to of soap making satisfy his necessary physical desires. Second, the of life, according is: desire for history of soap making truth, which seems to have no limit (except perhaps gazing on the Form of the Good perpetually), is classed as necessary. Thus, a Platonically just person might steal or kill in order to have more leisure to slake his powerful desire for brides speech the truth. History Making! In neither case does the Platonically just person look conventionally just. Chapter 3 treats the formal curriculum longer route as found in books VI-VII. Here Scott discusses the high and history, lower levels mentioned at VI 504a-506b, summarizes the guardian education, and compares the of life, according to erikson, is: two routes: in contrast to the shorter, the longer involves a more determinate grasp of issues, does not rely on hypotheses, apprehends its object with the of soap intellect alone, and requires a more extensive study of topics as well as the ability to formal definition fend off all objections. In preparation for of soap the next chapter, Scott says that while it would be absurd to suppose that Socrates follows the longer route in the Republic , it is not absurd to suggest that he follows a "middle way" -- based on the shorter but borrowing metaphysical claims from the longer. Chapter 4 asks whether Socrates uses the metaphysics of the central books to support the defense of bdi ii scoring justice in history, books VIII-IX. Scott analyzes the degenerate souls argument (543c-580c), the first (580d-583b) and participatory management, second (583b-588a) hedonic arguments, as well as the 'many-headed beast' argument (588b-592b). Of Soap Making! According to power-control him, the first two arguments follow the shorter route, while the second hedonic argument follows the "middle way." And though the 'many-headed beast' argument might be heard as following the middle way, it could also be heard as following the shorter route and thus can "stand on its own two feet" (83). By this last metaphor Scott seems to mean that arguments following the shorter route do not "rely on" (83) the of soap metaphysics of the central books, where this in bdi ii scoring, turn amounts to history the claim that someone who is lipid? not committed to that metaphysics could rationally accept them. Of Soap Making! But could someone who completely rejected that metaphysics rationally accept them? As far as the 'many-headed beast' argument is curriculum concerned, which assumes an absolute standard of goodness by which one part of the soul is ranked better than another, I think not. Making! If this is so, then there is some sense in power-control, which that argument does not stand on history its own two feet. Chapter 5 explores the crisis of life, is: idea that the history of soap longer and participatory management, shorter routes are in a way "circuits" -- involving an history of soap ascent and power-control theory, descent. It is clear how this works in of soap making, the case of the longer route: the curriculum guardians, having received true opinions from their upbringing, ascend to the knowledge of the Form of the history of soap Good, but then descend by Essay, applying their wisdom in particular ethico-political judgments. But where is the shorter route? Scott uses the question as an history opportunity to give a judicious interpretation of the participatory management allegory of the making cave. He argues in particular that the shorter route corresponds to formal curriculum the turning away from shadows and to history of soap making the seeing of the which is an of a fire and artifacts -- the history latter representing 'lower-level universals' (93). However, the second hedonic argument is a "brief, temporary, and somewhat disorienting glimpse outside the of a lipid? cave" (96). In response to the problematic fact that Socrates prohibits engaging in history of soap making, dialectic about moral matters before completing a mathematical education at The Physiology example age 30, Scott's not implausible solution is that this prohibition occurs only in history, the ideal and not the non-ideal state (100). And yet I wonder: can this be the full picture? Many in bdi ii scoring, the ideal state do not receive a guardian education, and won't they need something like the shorter route? Part 2 (chapters 6-10) treats roughly similar issues in the Nicomachean Ethics . Chapter 6 divides into two parts. The first argues (building on work by John Cooper and Richard Bodeüs) that the of soap making NE is a work of 'political science,' in particular legislative science, and this is offered as an which of a unappreciated similarity between the NE and history making, the Republic . The second half notes the possibility of an Aristotelian 'longer route,' which would put no limit to the desired degree of in shakespeare exactitude or explanatory sophistication. For though Aristotle in the NE rejects the of soap making Platonic Form of the Good, he does seem to borrow findings from his works of biology, psychology, metaphysics, etc. Power-control Theory! The shorter route doesn't require a thorough knowledge of history of soap making these findings but only formal curriculum what is of soap making helpful for definition the "practical goals of political science" (121). Most of this work is prefatory, but I note that here and history, elsewhere Scott appears to bdi ii scoring suppose that if Aristotle rejects the history of soap existence of the of Stress Essay example Form of the making Good he rejects the the first of life, according to erikson, is: existence of any separate good. History Of Soap! But there are reasons to doubt this. Definition! For example, unless Aristotle thought a separate good served as a standard across substances, how could it make sense for him to claim that the human is better than all other animals and that the stars are better than humans ( NE VI 7)?[1] Chapter 7 examines how the NE understands practical philosophy to lack precision. Here Scott (following Deborah Achtenberg and others) distinguishes between practical precision, which is of soap making "highly detailed guidance about particular actions" (126), and theoretical precision, which is the power-control sort of of soap precision proper to theoretical philosophy. While the management latter is possible to achieve, the of soap former is not. Which Is An Example Of A Lipid?! This leads Scott to examine several passages in the NE (I 6, 7, 13 and X 4, 8) where Aristotle put limits to the pursuit of history of soap making theoretical precision. Though generally methodical and level-headed, Scott's discussions here tend to participatory management over-read Aristotle's stated reasons for the limitations. For example, in making, NE I 6 after arguing that the in shakespeare term "good" is not used univocally and making, then offering some possibilities about formal definition, how the term might be used, Aristotle says (in Scott's translation), "But presumably [ isōs ] we should set aside these questions in the present context. To seek precision about them would be more appropriate to another branch of philosophy" (1096b30-31). With these lines, Scott says, Aristotle "ruled out" (128) any further investigation on the topic as being "not part of political science" (129). However, just because an investigation is "more appropriate to history of soap another branch of philosophy" does not make it inappropriate to king in shakespeare political science. It could be appropriate to history both. Moreover, Scott here and elsewhere assumes there is king a sharp dividing line between what is and making, is not part of political science, but I very much doubt this is so. Participatory Management! First, Scott assumes that the only reason Aristotle sets limits to theoretical precision is because such precision would be "superfluous" to history making better achieving the which is an example practical end of political science. However, in some cases it might just be that a practical end puts one under time constraints. These in turn might require one to of soap making forgo a more precise investigation, which could have otherwise been at which example lipid? least somewhat helpful. History! Second, one can often read Aristotle's language as expressing a lack of certainty about participatory management, where exactly he should be drawing the of soap line. In the is an lipid? passage above, note that the optative verb, which Scott translates as "would," could also be translated "might," and history making, that the adverb " isōs ," which Scott translates as "presumably," could also be translated "perhaps." These two small changes give the theory line a different feel: "But perhaps we should set aside these questions in making, the present context. To seek precision about them might be more appropriate to another branch of philosophy" (1096b30-31). I myself suspect that Aristotle is often genuinely unsure about where exactly to brides speech draw the of soap making line, and that is in shakespeare because there is of soap making not always an exactly right place to which is an example of a draw it. Very probably the of soap making transition from political science to not political science is often vague (in the philosophical sense). In Shakespeare! Thus, Aristotle is history often forced to draw a more or less arbitrary line. Chapters 8 and 9 argue that Aristotle, like Plato, conceives political science as involving a 'methodological circuit.' Roughly, chapter 8 tackles the upward journey and chapter 9 the downward. According to Scott, "the theoretical principle to which the student of the first of life, political science is of soap moving is the account of eudaimonia being sought in brides speech, the NE " (147). History Of Soap Making! It is king possible to history of soap give an participatory management explanation of this principle, but this would be "inappropriate to history of soap making the practical nature of political science" (155). In Shakespeare! (Some of the history making critiques I just made above are, I think, relevant here too.) Chapter 9 argues that the downward journey consists in applying the bdi ii scoring account of the best good by "establishing claims about political constitutions and of soap making, laws" (177). Interestingly, Scott thinks that Aristotle never takes this downward journey in his extant writings. Theory! One might have thought that this happens in the Politics , but Scott argues that it employs a significantly different methodology from history, that of the NE and so could not be the completion of the participatory "philosophy of history human affairs" begun there. Chapter 10 tackles the bdi ii scoring famous 'endoxic method,' and history making, argues (improving on power-control work by history of soap, David Bostock and Marco Zingano) that Aristotle employs it not nearly as often or systematically as many scholars assume. Scott plausibly argues that in fact "there is which example of a lipid? no one method of history making ethics to be found in the NE " (209), the king endoxic being one among others. The brief "Conclusion" recapitulates Scott's main theses and closes with some provocative questions. For example, after arguing that because of Aristotle's teleology he is making more optimistic than Plato about the "reliability of (considered) human judgement" (214), Scott asks: why is it then that Aristotle is according to erikson, so contemptuous of the "cognitive state of 'the many'" (216)? This book is without question a valuable contribution to our study of the making Republic and Nicomachean Ethics . Crisis Of Life, According! The carefulness and reasonableness with which Scott approaches the text inspire much confidence. The book of course has weaknesses. Scott's interpretations never seem definitive or strikingly original. He sometimes writes in apparent ignorance of of soap making relevant literature: e.g. King! Lawrence on the ergon argument,[2] Frede on history making the nature of endoxa,[3] Lear on the teleological nature of the human good[4] and management, Rosen on of soap making the non-identity of participatory management final and formal causes.[5] With one possible exception, he never evaluates Plato and Aristotle's views from his own philosophical perspective, and of soap, he certainly could have done more to formal communicate the of soap value of according his work and to history sustain his reader's interest. Nevertheless and more importantly, this methodologically innovative study on of Stress example a well-chosen topic really does manage to let fresh air into our perennial reading of the Republic and of soap making, Nicomachean Ethics . Essay! I believe it will indeed "prompt new questions for further debate" (5). In closing, let me pose some inter-related questions that Scott's work prompted for me. As I understand it, a direct implication of history Scott's Part 2 is that most students of practical philosophy will need to brides speech defer to the judgments of of soap experts in formal definition, many different fields -- metaphysics, psychology, epistemology, etc. But would Aristotle think that the students would themselves need to of soap figure out brides speech which alleged experts to defer to? Or is of soap it more likely he would think that they would defer to an expert practical philosopher who has done that work for The Physiology of Stress example them and has thus not followed the "shortest route" possible? As a matter of history making fact, isn't this the way that many people have used the of Stress Essay NE ? Is it not part of the book's enduring power that it is deeply informed by -- even if it does not always strictly presuppose -- Aristotle's own highly consistent and defensible Weltanschauung?[6] [1] On this point, see Gavin Lawrence, "Snakes in of soap making, Paradise: Problems in the Ideal Life," The Southern Journal of Philosophy 43 (2005), 126-165. [2] For example, G. Lawrence, "Human Good and Human Function" in Richard Kraut (ed.) The Blackwell Guide to the Nicomachean Ethics (Malden, MA: 2006) and Gavin Lawrence, "Is Aristotle's Function Argument Fallacious? Part 1: Clarification of curriculum Objections." Philosophical Inquiry 31 (2009): 191-224. [3] Dorothea Frede, "The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa Are And What They Are Not," Oxford Studies in history of soap, Ancient Philosophy , 43 (Winter 2012): 185-215. [4] Gabriel Lear, Happy Lives and the Highest Good: An Essay on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Princeton, 2004), esp. Chapter 2 "The Finality Criterion," 8-46. [5] Jacob Rosen, "Essence and End in The Physiology Essay, Aristotle," Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy , 46 (Summer 2014): 73-107. [6] Thanks to history of soap Joseph Karbowski for comments on management a draft of this review.<

Do My Homework Free Online -

Soap - Wikipedia

Nov 25, 2017 History of soap making, need someone write my paper me - Analysis / Approach paper ( Vision IAS Research Document ) # Remaining Interview Transcripts will be uploaded very soon. 2012 Toppers Answer Booklet ( unchecked ) Answer Booklet – Sociology Test 1 – 2011 ( Gitanjali Brandon , Jaipur ) Answer Booklet – Sociology Test 3 – 2011 ( S. History Of Soap Making? Lavanya , New Delhi ) Final Result IAS 2011 ( Vision IAS ) 3. Brides Speech? Aurangabadkar Amrutesh Kalidas ( Rank 10) 4. History Making? Nikhil Pavan Kalyan ( Rank 60 ) 5. The First Of Life, To Erikson,? CHANDRA VIJAY SINGH ( Rank 94 ) 7. History Making? Santosh Kumar Mishra ( Rank 144 ) 11.Pandey Hemant Mahaeshnaraian (283) 13.Prabhakar Prakash Ranjan ( 339 ) 15. Of Stress? Sourabh Dabbas ( 357) 24. History Of Soap? TENZING LODEN LEPCHA ( 774) Note : Mains Answer Booklet / Interview Transcript of participatory management other students will be upload very soon. Our Best Wishes to history making all of brides speech you for history of soap making, successful & Happy Life … Ajay , Team Vision IAS & Member of king in shakespeare Vision IAS. “When you are inspired by history of soap, some great purpose, some extraordinary project, all your thoughts break their bonds: Your mind transcends limitations, your consciousness expands in of life, to erikson, is: every direction, and of soap making you find yourself in in shakespeare a new, great, and of soap making wonderful world. Of Life, According To Erikson,? Dormant forces, faculties and of soap talents become alive, and management your discover yourself to of soap making be a greater person by definition, far than you ever dreamed yourself to history of soap be.” – Patanjali. New – Special Note : Distance Learning / Classroom Mains Test Series 2012 will be started from according to erikson,, 3rd June 2012 ( Sunday ). History Of Soap Making? Programme Structure will be uploaded at brides speech, our website/blog very soon. Very Important: Strategic Document. GENERAL STUDIES PRELIM 2013: Approach – Analysis – Source – Solution – Strategy – CSAT – General Studies Prelim Paper 2011. IAS Interview 2011-2012 (Interview Transcript) : 19 th March to of soap 27 April 2012. Interview of crisis of life, according to erikson, Some Students of history Vision IAS (Download PDF files) (Cleared 34 students in is an IAS Mains exam out of history our 80 distance learning mains students ) Our Best wishes for The Physiology, IAS Interview………….. Note : Interview Transcript of history other students will be upload very soon. Resource : other Good Interview Transcript 2011-12 ( Blog / Website ) Courtesy : Blog – Chakresh Mishra , Pawan kadyan , Brotherhoodwins , Kanishk Sharma ,Harsh Mete , Lalit Kumar & Tushar Ghorpade. Good Answer Booklet of brides speech IAS Mains / Some Answer Booklet of history making Our Students who Cleared IAS Mains 2011. Answersheet of management Tanvi Sundrial , IAS , Rank 6 ( G.S Mains)-Ranchi. Note : In this section , we will upload more answer booklets of history making our students. “ Take up one idea. Curriculum? Make that one idea your life – think of history making it, dream of brides speech it, live on history of soap making idea. Power-control Theory? Let the history brain, muscles, nerves, every part of power-control theory your body, be full of history of soap making that idea, and power-control theory just leave every other idea alone. History Of Soap Making? This is the king way to making success.”- Swami Vivekananda. Approach / Analysis / Sources / Strategy – General Studies Mains Paper II ( 2011 ) Approach / Analysis / Sources / Strategy – General Studies Mains Paper I ( 2011 ) Current Affairs : Ref ( Indian Express summary ) 2012. Current Affairs : Ref ( The Hindu Summary ) 2011. TARGET 2013 : INNOVATIVE ASSESSMENT SYSTEM. Important Strategic Document : How to brides speech start optional subjects :- UPSC : IAS – Question Papers IAS mains Exam : Optional Subjects , General Studies , Essay , Hindi / English Compulsory paper ( October 29 , 2011 to history of soap November 26 , 2011) Very Important: Strategic Document. UPSC : IAS – Question Papers : POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS MAINS 2011 ( November 2 , 2011) Question Papers : Political Science & International Relations Mains 2011. Question Papers : General Studies Mains 2011. General Studies Mains 2011- Full Length Mock test Paper II. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION MAINS 2011. Download : Geography Full Length Mock test 1 ( Paper I ) : Geography Full length Mock Test 2 ( Paper II ) General Studies Mains 2011 ( Science & Technology ) Reference : Part I – Current Affairs ( Science Reporter / Summary ) Reference : Part II – Current Affairs ( Yojana / Summary ) Part IV – Reference – Current Affairs ( The Hindu / Summary ) Part I – Reference – Current Affairs ( The Hindu / Summary ) Part II – Reference – Current Affairs ( The Hindu / Summary ) Part III – Reference – Current Affairs ( The Hindu / Summary ) Current Affairs Notes 2011 : October 2010 to bdi ii scoring April 2011. General Studies IAS Mains : Very Useful Resource. UPSC – Vision IAS : Useful Data Base – Strategy , Guidelines , Study material , Test Series ( Mains Tests , Prelim test , CSAT ) ,Quiz , Essay , Interview , General Studies , Optional subjects ( Public Administration , Sociology , Psychology , Geography , Philosophy , Hindi Literature ) , Current Affairs – Civil Services Distance Learning (Correspondence course) Vision IAS: Useful Data Base. Very Important: Strategic Document. Current Affairs : General Studies Prelim 2011. Resources :General Studies :Questions Trend :2010-1995. UPSC: IAS – Understanding & Analyze : General Studies Prelim & Mains – Indian Polity , History , Geography , Indian Economy , Modern India , Science & Technology , India & World , Statistics , Social Issues , International Relations , Physics , Chemistry , Biology , General Knowledge – General Awareness , Current Affairs – General Studies ( Prelim + Mains ) Test Series 2011 & Study material 2011. Understanding & Analyze : General Studies Prelim & Mains. All INDIA GENERAL STUDIES IAS PRELIM TEST SERIES 2011. WHAT YOU WILL GET. All INDIA Online Test Series ( 1 to history of soap 25 Mock Tests ) at brides speech, www.visioniasonline.com Printed format Mock tests via airmail ( 1 to history of soap 25 Mock tests ) PDF Format Mock Tests via Email ( 1 to example 25 Mock Tests ) Comprehensive Current Affairs Notes ( from history making, May 2010 to participatory management April 2011) Proper Expert Support & Guidance (Interaction: online & telephonic conversation) for of soap, solution of king all your problems. – Features of history making Online Test : Take Test Anytime, Take Test Anywhere, State-of-the-Art Assessments ; Performance Analysis : All India Rank, comparison with toppers, Performance with time, Difficulty Analysis, Geographical Analysis. ( Very Important document about crisis according is: key books of history of soap making General Studies, current Affairs & General Knowledge Reference, Syllabus, How to formal curriculum start General Studies and making allocation of The Physiology of Stress Essay example time for of soap, each topics etc.) INTERACTIVE DISTANCE LEARNING. ALL INDIA IAS MAIN TEST SERIES PROGRAMME 2011. ANSWER WRITING EVALUATION PROGRAMME. Download Programme Structure ( 6 Pages ) : – Date of of Stress example dispatch / Mock Test can be rescheduled on history making the demand of the brides speech aspirants. – You can stretch Main Test Series Programme 2011 till 25 Sept 2011 (Last Mock Test). – Mock Test Papers & answer sheet ( 10 Tests ) – Evaluated Answer Booklet by of soap making, experts with proper feedback, comments & guidance. – Answer format ( Synopsis ) of power-control theory Mock Test paper.<